On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 11:35:27PM +0200, Falk Brockerhoff wrote: > Claudio Jeker schrieb: > > > There are still some issues with carp and the routes it modifies on the > > fly. Ospfd and bgpd have problems to see carp routes as connected. > > You can force ospfd to redistribute the route by mentioning the network > > directly in the redistribute statement for now until the real issue is > > fixed. > > The route is redistributed correctly, but the local static route to the > carp-interface is not deleted when the state changes to init or backup. > > Ok, I think a good way is to use the ifstated workaround a few days > longer :) >
Interface routes should not be removed by the kernel even in the carp case. It will cause many more porblems later on (readding the route will fail). This will be fixed with route priorities. -- :wq Claudio