On 6/11/07, Karsten McMinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
alot of anti-cert sentiment. borderline misinformation in
some cases. I've interviewed folks with and without certs.
I don't know why some people insist on arguing
that "book != cover"[1] with regard to certs. silly.

here's a couple points for consideration:

I think those are extremely good points.  As with everything else, not
everything is black and white.  And in certain cases, certifications
do ensure a minimum level of knowledge.  I try to keep an open mind.
Certain certs, I don't really care (ie, mcse).  Other certs, such as
ccnp, do imply a minimum level of knowledge.  Of course, there are
dumb as rocks CCIEs too.

One thing to keep in mind, just because I have a cert doesn't mean I
don't know what I'm doing.  Sometimes, it is necessary, for example,
to get past HR.  Way back in the mid-90s, a large back in town was
hiring for a security guy.  I tried for months to apply, but never got
past the HR firewall.  One day, the hiring manager put his own ad out,
with his email address.  I sent in my resume, and was immediately
summoned for an interview, and offered the job right then.  It was a
damned cool job too - he told me 70% of my time will be spent surfing
the net!!! :)

--
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity."
-- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.

Reply via email to