On May 8, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:39:50PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
So you are saying that ccd(4) has reliability problems? I actually
meant to ask what type of physical memory does the box take. Thanks
for your response.
No no, ccd(4) works as designed. And for concatenated disks, it does
exactly what you would expect that to be. For mirrored disks, though,
you'd like it to have better support for rebuilding after failures.
I understand. I am really only interested in mirroring so I guess I
should just probably use raidframe and see how it goes.
Bryan
