On 2007/05/01 12:53, Toni Mueller wrote: > I'm not convinced, but instead think that one router put in between > solves the problem. That's because this other router won't even (need > to) know the other (same) network on the other ADSL device.
Right. I'm not sure it's needed at all though, I think there may be a way with reply-to or possibly rtable. It may be a hack, but 'virtual routing' is becoming more common as people need to connect networks on the same address range (e.g. with company mergers, or VPNs involving multiple organisations, where it would be "challenging" to renumber everything). Google: vrf nat.
