-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 6-apr-2007, at 0:51, Andris Delfino wrote:
Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted). Licenses are licenses.
Would it be wrong to develop software using existing GPL'ed code as a starting point. And bit by bit rewrite the code until you have rewritten all of it. Then releasing the final code under an BSD license? I still don't know exactly what happened, but I suspect the process went something like this. Only the code in the development phase was public too and this is what pissed of the developers of the GPL'ed version. Floor iD8DBQFGFYMsUnW3VkBpTO4RAoz0AJ9QbDrwd4JYO9mooUxx6TRhm5clDwCeNGW2 IvES2c/ESqR3o38RjW6sEyY= =c/+8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
