Shawn K. Quinn wrote:

> It wouldn't have been the first time Theo published e-mails; from what I
> have observed, he doesn't do so without good cause.

Sure.  I was addressing only the point that *Daniel* did something wrong
by publishing the private emails, after Theo indicated he was willing to
take the whole matter public.  Now, the exchange as posted by Daniel
appears to me to simply affirm Theo's initial description of the
exchange, so I don't understand *why* he posted it...
-- 
 Matthew Weigel
 hacker
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to