Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > It wouldn't have been the first time Theo published e-mails; from what I > have observed, he doesn't do so without good cause.
Sure. I was addressing only the point that *Daniel* did something wrong by publishing the private emails, after Theo indicated he was willing to take the whole matter public. Now, the exchange as posted by Daniel appears to me to simply affirm Theo's initial description of the exchange, so I don't understand *why* he posted it... -- Matthew Weigel hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
