"Karl O. Pinc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 03/15/2007 11:04:49 PM, Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
> 
> > That's what I was going to say.  If you did things properly,
> > you would have had this patch applied before you knew that it
> > was a remote hole.
> 
> You have a valid point: any bug is a security problem.
> However, the topic is not my management practices and
> the tradeoffs involved therein.  The topic is the
> efficacy of the security-announce list.  If I knew
> security-announce was broken I could write a screen-scraper
> to check the errata page for me.

Any bug is a security problem. Let's forward source-changes to
security-announce.

//art

Reply via email to