I run spamd up front with a secondary spam filter behind it. My secondary filter receives 90% less spam then before I started running spamd. With that big of a drop I can only say wonderful things about OpenBSD's spamd. It just plain works. When things start getting back to pre spamd levels then I'll worry about the "spammers catching on".
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Bob Beck
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Darren Spruell
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Joachim Schipper
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Bob Beck
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Darren Spruell
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Brian Keefer
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? ericfurman
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Brian Keefer
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Wade, Daniel
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? J Moore
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Darren Spruell
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Philip Guenther
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Darren Spruell
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Philip Guenther
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Peter N. M. Hansteen
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Darrin Chandler
- Re: spamd unnecessarily abrasive? Peter N. M. Hansteen