bofh wrote:
On 1/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that the usual pack of idiots on misc@ can't contribut adequatly
agree
Remember that dimwit "I do let the windows machine have web contact to
the outside"
who thinks simple packet filtering will keep his windows "children"
safe.Real 7337,whatever
that is.
Oh, come now, everyone knows that doesn't work. What really works is
- NAT!!! Yes, really! *smirk* We have a NotWork engineer who thinks
nat is the answer to everything. The useless excuse for an oxygen
sink even wanted to NAT our public IPs in our DR site instead of
routing it in. Of course, for a "I am CCNP, except that cisco lost my
paperwork" person who can't even set a damned default route on a 6509,
natting _is_ the best way to do things, since *he* didn't have to do
it.
whats sad is how many people will never let go of NAT after they migrate
to ipv6.
