On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:34:47PM -0800, Passeur wrote: > Alright sorry guys I thought it was the official WIKI website. > Anyway let say I can not use QEMU, which is the case, what would you > recommend to build a live CD ? Having a second machine ? Even virtual, or > can we bypass this step as the other LiveCD FAQS do not even talk about a > second host.
You do not _need_ a seperate installation, but it makes stuff much easier than installing everything into a chroot (incl. packages). If you want further advice lets take this private. Regards, ahb > > Andreas Bihlmaier-2 wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 03:49:25PM -0800, Passeur wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am trying to build a live CD based on the official OpenBSD article. > >> (http://www.openbsd-wiki.org/index.php?title=LiveCD) > > > > This is not official. > > > >> qemu-img create ~/livecd.qemu.hd0 2G > >> Ran fine, I have got a 2GB virtual drive. > >> > >> qemu -hda ~/livecd.qemu.hd0 -cdrom /home/cd40.iso -boot d > >> Error message after validation of the previous command: > >> > >> Could not initialize SDL - Exiting > > > > What you just did is using qemu, doesn't have anything to do with > > LiveCD, thus you might want to bug ports@ about it. > > > > In order to help post: > > - dmesg > > - pkg_info > > - qemu -h | grep version > > > >> > >> I have some articles and they were talking about the fact we need to > >> recomp > >> the Kernell with SDL support ? > >> Is that so ? > > > > Kernel with SDL support? WTF? > > No you do not need to change your kernel for userland stuff. > > > >> Thank you > > > > Regards, > > ahb > > > > Btw. > > (for those enjoying christian traditions): Merry Christmas > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/LiveCD-building-error-tf2875827.html#a8043613 > Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
