On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:45:42AM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On 12/17/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >But maybe there's a good reason why this was done the way it is? I CC'ed
> >the maintainer, maybe he'll find the time to respond...
> >
> >If this works for you, and Chris (= the maintainer) doesn't respond
> >soonish telling us why this was done in this way, please let us know.
>
> Because that's what "make update-plist" did? If "vim -y" is useful
> behaviour in non-x11 mode then it should probably be made available in
> the no_x11 package.
At the very least, adding evim.vim allows 'vim -y' to work as
documented, and as it did in previous versions. Even if the -y option is
not terribly useful - after all, it was used by so few people that this
change only now turned up - doing what's documented is generally a good
idea.
Joachim
