Hi I install Opeen in AMD in low profile hardware (msi K8MM-V 8237) a work good width 100 users intranet and 5 vpn conexions in amd64. I dont have the oportuniti to probe width good hardaware.
I prefer amd thant intel. OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #462: Thu Mar 2 03:52:16 MST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC real mem = 469299200 (458300K) avail mem = 390574080 (381420K) using 11508 buffers containing 47136768 bytes (46032K) of memory mainbus0 (root) cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor) cpu0: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+, 2200.16 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,NXE,MMXX,FFXSR,LONG,3DNOW2,3DNOW cpu0: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 512KB 64b/line 16-way L2 cache cpu0: ITLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative cpu0: DTLB 32 4KB entries fully associative, 8 4MB entries fully associative pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "VIA K8M800 Host" rev 0x00 pchb1 at pci0 dev 0 function 1 "VIA K8M800 Host" rev 0x00 pchb2 at pci0 dev 0 function 2 "VIA K8M800 Host" rev 0x00 pchb3 at pci0 dev 0 function 3 "VIA K8M400 Host" rev 0x00 pchb4 at pci0 dev 0 function 4 "VIA K8M800 Host" rev 0x00 pchb5 at pci0 dev 0 function 7 "VIA K8M800 Host" rev 0x00 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 "VIA K8HTB AGP" rev 0x00 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "VIA S3 Unichrome PRO IGP" rev 0x01 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) ppb1 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 "Texas Instruments PCI2250 PCI-PCI" rev 0x02 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 sis0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "NS DP83815 10/100" rev 0x00, DP83816A: irq 10, address 00:00:24:c6:7a:00 nsphyter0 at sis0 phy 0: DP83815 10/100 PHY, rev. 1 sis1 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 "NS DP83815 10/100" rev 0x00, DP83816A: irq 11, address 00:00:24:c6:7a:01 nsphyter1 at sis1 phy 0: DP83815 10/100 PHY, rev. 1 sis2 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 "NS DP83815 10/100" rev 0x00, DP83816A: irq 5, address 00:00:24:c6:7a:02 nsphyter2 at sis2 phy 0: DP83815 10/100 PHY, rev. 1 sis3 at pci2 dev 3 function 0 "NS DP83815 10/100" rev 0x00, DP83816A: irq 11, address 00:00:24:c6:7a:03 nsphyter3 at sis3 phy 0: DP83815 10/100 PHY, rev. 1 hifn0 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 "Hifn 7955/7954" rev 0x00: LZS 3DES ARC4 MD5 SHA1 RNG AES PK, 32KB dram, irq 11 pciide0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 "VIA VT6420 SATA" rev 0x80: DMA pciide0: using irq 11 for native-PCI interrupt wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: <HDS728080PLA380> wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 78533MB, 160836480 sectors wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5 pciide1 at pci0 dev 15 function 1 "VIA VT82C571 IDE" rev 0x06: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility pciide1: channel 0 disabled (no drives) pciide1: channel 1 disabled (no drives) uhci0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x81: irq 10 usb0 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0 at usb0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1 at pci0 dev 16 function 1 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x81: irq 10 usb1 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1 at usb1 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2 at pci0 dev 16 function 2 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x81: irq 11 usb2 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2 at usb2 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3 at pci0 dev 16 function 3 "VIA VT83C572 USB" rev 0x81: irq 11 usb3 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3 at usb3 uhub3: VIA UHCI root hub, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0 at pci0 dev 16 function 4 "VIA VT6202 USB" rev 0x86: irq 5 usb4 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub4 at usb4 uhub4: VIA EHCI root hub, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered viapm0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 "VIA VT8237 ISA" rev 0x00 iic0 at viapm0 "unknown" at iic0 addr 0x2f not configured auvia0 at pci0 dev 17 function 5 "VIA VT8233 AC97" rev 0x60: irq 5 ac97: codec id 0x56494170 (VIA Technologies <70>) ac97: codec features headphone, 18 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, KS Waves 3D audio0 at auvia0 vr0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 "VIA RhineII-2" rev 0x78: irq 10, address 00:16:17:4a:f7:69 ukphy0 at vr0 phy 1: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface, rev. 10: OUI 0x004063, model 0x0032 pchb6 at pci0 dev 24 function 0 "AMD AMD64 HyperTransport" rev 0x00 pchb7 at pci0 dev 24 function 1 "AMD AMD64 Address Map" rev 0x00 pchb8 at pci0 dev 24 function 2 "AMD AMD64 DRAM Cfg" rev 0x00 pchb9 at pci0 dev 24 function 3 "AMD AMD64 Misc Cfg" rev 0x00 isa0 at mainbus0 isadma0 at isa0 com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot) pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi0 at pcppi0: <PC speaker> spkr0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 lm0 at isa0 port 0x290/8: W83627THF fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 root on wd0a rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302 On 11/17/06, Rod.. Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:27:24 +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: >On 2006/11/17 10:20, Joe wrote: >> VIA ITX boards work great. > >one of mine doesn't, it has leaky caps. > > Whip over here and I'll replace them for you. I have a vacuum desol station and a supply of the commonest badcap replacements. Maybe tossing the board is cheaper if you don't live near Sydney, of course. ~|^ From the land "down under": Australia. Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over? Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list. Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server. Your IP address will also be greytrapped for 24 hours after any attempt. I am continually amazed by the people who run OpenBSD who don't take this advice. I always expected a smarter class. I guess not.
