On Oct 12, 2006, at 9:42 AM, Cabillot Julien wrote:
It's no very expensive, the "electric consumption" (I don't know if
this
expression is ok), the size, ...
On 10/12/06, Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 07:31:39AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
I meant more CPU processing cycles per a given constant
amount of money! That's it.
Hmmm, before I answer that question I'd like to know what are
the intended uses? For example, for a DNS server I would
seriously consider some of the platforms recently added, armish
for one.
What advantages do you see from building a DNS server using
armish?
m
And most of the time DNS doesn't require much in the way of
resources, at least from my experience. I imagine it could use more
resources if you are doing IPV6 and DNSSEC (as it says in the bind
manual).
Mike
