On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:06:12AM -0400, Martin Gignac wrote: > On 10/11/06, Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I'm familiar with 3261. However the SIP proxy that 3261 talks > about has a completely different function than what an ALG/SBC does. > Maybe I shouldn't have used the term "SIP proxy" in my previous > e-mails. My bad. > > -Martin > No, it isn't your mistake Martin. I am overworked :-) and have not been following your threads.
Moreover you are exceeding my level of understanding of the topic. :-) Sorry, hope you solve your problem soon. Wish you Godspeed! Back to work! regards, Girish
