On Tuesday 10 October 2006 06:36, RedShift wrote: > You would think _somebody_ would at least make an attempt at it.
You would think so but funny how that someone, who is supposed to do this on their free time and maybe on their own expense, is always someone else. > I can > imagine OpenBSD being reduced to something that is used on embedded > devices. It's not really much for desktop (compared with other operating > systems) and without decent SMP support and a huge list of RAID > controllers, There's a lot of RAID controllers supported, just not on sparc64. Heck, it even supports all my hardware better than Windows but maybe that's because I think before I buy. > active use of OpenBSD in server environments could drop > rapidly. Even the most basic servers nowadays are equipped with a dual > core processor. If OpenBSD's performance/scalability doesn't improve > this is the most likely scenario. How about you stop whining and donate some money or machines to the project then? > Asking for code submission if you want feature x or y doesn't really > float my boat. I only do some high level programming and I know nothing > about kernel internals. I guess you didn't understand; OpenBSD does not exist for you or me, it exists for the developers. --- Lars Hansson
