On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:40:20AM +1000, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:45:28 -0500, David Bryan wrote:
> 
> >The other reason for not mounting the CF in a read/write mode is that CF 
> >has a limited number of write cycles (~10,000 gate transisitions). 
> 
> I have a 4801 with CF installed with 3.9 in exactly the manner I would
> install on a HDD.
> 
> Partitions are mounted noatime, softdep in addition to the default
> options.

I have run HDs in net4801's and had two fail. Both were Toshiba drives.
I do not think it was anything that was wrong with the drive, just lack
of cooling. I have also been running a net4501 for just shy of two years
as a DNS server with a 512MB Sandisk CF card. It has been running
flawlessly. I would not bother with mounting / read-only in a normal
situation. The only reason I do is so I can power off the box at will
and not worry about filesystem issues. (This one is a mobile AP.)

> I am inclined to think that farting around doing fancy stuff with
> custom kernels and mfs is a waste of time which would cost more than a
> new CF and a standard install. Even so I will not continue with spamd
> on the firewall, but it has shown me that CF is tougher now than when I
> first used it.

I agree completely! CF cards are cheap and work great. I was amazed to
get two Sandisk 1GB CF cards recently for US $35 each.

Bryan

Reply via email to