What would it be the working group for the IPSec protocol? The one that relates all the necessary RFC for defining it.
thanks in advance. On 9/13/06, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-13 21:30]: > * Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-13 13:20]: > > Does pfsync support redundancy for IPSec and NAT too? > > > > Thanks in advance. > pfsync synch's NAT states along with the rest of pf state. NAT is nt special - it's beasically just a state, yes. > IPsec is not done by pfsync. RTFM at sasyncd(8) for info > on how to do that. actually, that _is_ partially done via pfsync. sasyncd is needed on top. -- Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
