Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Marc G. Fournier dixit: > > > And what I'm learning with bsdstats.org is that there are more then just > > those > > four ... GNU/kFreeBSD is reporting > > Now _that_'s funny ;)
Yes, indeed. Some people are really wasting their time. > > are there any others? > > DragonFly Is already included on bsdstats.org. > DesktopBSD > PC-BSD Those two aren't separate operating systems, but rather FreeBSD with a custom GUI on top (live-FS / installer). They shouldn't be counted separately. > [...] > picoBSD > nanoBSD > > The latter three are probably just stripped-down versions of > the bigger ones. True. It could be argued whether they should be counted separately. Personally I don't think they should. The "big ones" are clearly DragonFly, Free-, Net- and OpenBSD. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. cat man du : where Unix geeks go when they die
