Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I doubt that'll be productive -- NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD have all
different goals...
Even at the kernel level? Look at device drivers and vendors as one
example ... companies like adaptec have to write *one* device driver,
for, what, 50+ distributions of linux ... for us, they need to write
one for FreeBSD, one for NetBSD, one for OpenBSD, and *now* one for
DragonflyBSD ... if we had *at least* a common API for that sort of
stuff, it might be asier to get support at the vendor level, no?
How would a common API provide more support from the vendor ? What does
the API have to do with releasing documentation ?
