On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 06:49:43PM +0200, Stefan Sczekalla-Waldschmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a subnet 192.168.110.0 to subnet 10.11.12.0 IPSEC Tunnel running
> fine.
>
> Now the owner of the remote end of the vpn-tunnel asks if I can change
> vpn-config and do Nat to 172.3.4.0 because he has some trouble routing
> packets from my 192.168.110.0 network.
>
> I don't hav any problems to change the vpn-config to fit his needs, but
> is there a way to nat at my incoming(LAN)if so, that the packets gets
> natted ( masqueraded ) before they enter the tunnel ?
This is a painful proposition, and has been discussed before; did you
read the archives? (You are not exactly the first to ask, you know...)
Joachim
