> On CARP'd machines, it can be kinda handy, make a quick change on the > primary, test it, if it works, run the script. If it doesn't, you can > easily revert it by simply running the script on the standby machine. > > Nick. > > Ah...that is a pretty cool idea. I was more curious about dynamically syncing them though, as opposed to having any user interaction. For example, say you have redundant firewalls with a table which is populated by the overflow keyword, it may be useful to sync this table between master and backup nodes, without manual intervention -- so that in the event of a failover, the backup has the same hosts in in it's tables. Does that make sense?
Kian
