I can not reproduce this in 4.0-beta. $ pwd /home/ak $ cd tmp; cd .. $ pwd /home/ak
Your example is just on the limit of how deeply you can follow symbolic links: $ pwd /usr/local/lib/qt3/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib $ cd lib; cd .. ksh: cd: /usr/local/lib/qt3/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib - Too many levels of symbolic links $ pwd /usr/local/lib/qt3/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib As you can see, it does leave me at one level above of where I was. Andreas On 09/08/06, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bug in OpenBSD 3.9? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/lib/qt3/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib$ cd lib; cd .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/lib$ Shouldn't the correct answer be [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/lib/qt3/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib/lib$ ? If you do cd subdir; cd .. I guess you should end up in the same working directory as before. CL<
-- Andreas Kahari Somewhere in the general Cambridge area, UK
