On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:22:09AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> >         inet6 fe80::201:80ff:fe0f:6683%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
                                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^
> Because IPv6 is a broken and designed by a 
> IETF-let's-overengeneer-everything-with-useless-features standart comitee.
> You know it is not enough to have 128bit address space to identify hosts,
> no you need an additional information -- the scope -- to make link local
> addresses useable on systems with more then one interface.

I found some explanation to scope in RFC 2373 page 14.  Here is a paste:

---
      scop is a 4-bit multicast scope value used to limit the scope of
      the multicast group.  The values are:

         0  reserved
         1  node-local scope
         2  link-local scope
         3  (unassigned)
         4  (unassigned)
         5  site-local scope
         6  (unassigned)
         7  (unassigned)
         8  organization-local scope
         9  (unassigned)
         A  (unassigned)
         B  (unassigned)
         C  (unassigned)
---

A scope of 0x1 would be node local and would need to be 0x2 possibly for one
to ping another host on the same LAN.

> So to ping systems via their link local address you need to specify the
> outgoing interface in the address like this:
> ping6 fe80::2d0:b7ff:fe4c:3365%em0
> 
> Cool isn't it?

Ugh :P~~~. :)

> And by the way I think that site local addresses where killed from the
> standart some time ago (it caused even more troubles to handle these
> correctly). So don't start using them.
> 
> > I managed to find loads of stuff about IPv6 routers, DNS, tunnelling
> > etc but not much early stage education that I can implement for lab
> > work to get me up to speed.
> > 
> 
> As you may realize I'm a big fan of IPv6.

I'm sure you're not the only one! ;)

High regards,

-peter

-- 
Here my ticker tape .signature #### My name is Peter Philipp #### lynx -dump 
"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pufferfish&oldid=20768394"; | sed -n 
131,136p #### There is no such thing as a certified security specialist #### 
Security is the countermeasure to a constantly changing idea of how to 
compromise a system when given the opportunity #### What you really mean is a 
certified security historian, and even that depends on how up-to-date you are 
and on your cognitive abilities #### Feeling special still?  How well can you 
program? #### So long and thanks for all the fish!!!

Reply via email to