On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:55:38AM +0200, Jerome Loyet wrote: > Hello, re
> After a large investigation I figured out that some people have problems > with OpenBSD on that machine and some don't. > > The hardware is strictly the same. All hardware tests pass fine. > The only difference between the 2 kind of machine is about the BIOS version > installed. > > The differences between the two BIOS are: > - The vcore has been updated to +0.1v > - Pstate has been removed > > The second release of the BIOS seams to be buggy on OpenBSD. bios is not ON openbsd. if one version works and the other is not then it's a bug in bios and they shall fix it. > Someone could help me to understand on this please ? > > Thx ++ Jerome > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > De la part de Jerome Loyet > > Envoye : mardi 30 mai 2006 23:28 > > A : misc@openbsd.org > > Objet : Re: Kernel panic "smashed stack in ufs_makeinode" > > > > In fact this is not just a problem with my machine. > > I bought a dedicated server (www.dedibox.fr). I installed > > OpenBSD 3.9 on it. > > Other people did exactly the same and the have the same problem. > > > > This is NOT a hardware which is disfunctioning. This must be > > a problem of compatibility. > > > > Any idees ? > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > De la part > > > de Spruell, Darren-Perot Envoyi : mardi 30 mai 2006 23:06 @ : > > > misc@openbsd.org Objet : Re: Kernel panic "smashed stack in > > > ufs_makeinode" > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I got another kernel panic: free: non-malloced addr 0x10 type temp > > > > > > > > Many programs seg fault with "Program terminated with signal 11, > > > > Segmentation fault" > > > > > > > > The memory has been tested with memtest86. > > > > > > > > Any idees? > > > > > > I've had memtest86 report good memory when I had a system throwing > > > spurious signal 11s. The fix was swapping out memory in the end. I > > > don't suppose > > > memtest86 is supposed to be able to detect all memory > > problems, yeah? > > > > > > DS > > > > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type > > application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] > > [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature > which had a name of smime.p7s] > -- paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
