On 5/26/06, Diego Giagio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/25/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how many parse_config functions do you think spamd needs?
It was an example. The point is: is there a reason for not using
static on functions with internal linkage? There's at least one reason
to use static: name clashes.
And Marco was explaining why he (and probably other OpenBSD devs)
don't use static: name clashes. static makes things more difficult to
debug, and having 50 different static functions named the same thing
could get pretty confusing in large projects.
