Henning Brauer schrieb: > * Thomas Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-17 21:01]: >> Probably I need a filter list to get the behaviour I expect. This works >> well with IPv4, but not with IPv6: >> >> /etc/bgpd.conf:77: king bula sez: AF_INET only >> >> Whereas line 77 is: >> >> allow to $peer1 prefix fd:202c:ffff:80::/64 >> >> Is it planned to implement IPv6 prefixes in the filters? > > hmm, I need to check again what is missing, I thought we had the basics > all done... either I misremmeber or I missed sth.
OK, so I wait until a fix appears in CVS HEAD. >> How well is IPv6 tested yet? I have seen some older postings which state >> that it's not well tested. I plan to use v4 and v6, but I need the later >> one for the time being only for testing and development purposes and not >> for critical applications. Shall I worry about not fully tested v6 support? > > if nobody tests it, it won;t get tested... > my test feed worked well whenever I tested. I do not have any v6 > production systems. > I would not worry too much. I doubt you'll see any dramatic failures. > You might run into things like the above, where parts of the code are > v4 only and complain. but that really doesn't affect v4 operation, > right :) Fine. As soon as filter lists are implemented you'll get one more tester (me :-) Regards, Thomas.
