Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> Lars is referring to auth_verify(3) and the like, which implements full
> authentication. It's a far more robust solution, not in the least
> because it ties in with all the other supported authentication options.
>
> Joachim
>
>
Sorry. My mistake. I didn't knew about the auth_verify method. Sounds
very interesting and much simpler than the getpwnam(3) method. I will
study it, and, maybe, write the plugin. Do you know if the program
calling these functions must be running with uid 0 or be part of any
special group?
Thanks,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
Linux User 172199
Moleque Sem Conteudo Numero #002
Slackware Current
OpenBSD Stable
Snike Tecnologia em Informatica
4386 2A6F FFD4 4D5F 5842 6EA0 7ABE BBAB 9C0E 6B85
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of signature.asc]
