Joachim Schipper wrote: > > Lars is referring to auth_verify(3) and the like, which implements full > authentication. It's a far more robust solution, not in the least > because it ties in with all the other supported authentication options. > > Joachim > > Sorry. My mistake. I didn't knew about the auth_verify method. Sounds very interesting and much simpler than the getpwnam(3) method. I will study it, and, maybe, write the plugin. Do you know if the program calling these functions must be running with uid 0 or be part of any special group?
Thanks, -- Giancarlo Razzolini Linux User 172199 Moleque Sem Conteudo Numero #002 Slackware Current OpenBSD Stable Snike Tecnologia em Informatica 4386 2A6F FFD4 4D5F 5842 6EA0 7ABE BBAB 9C0E 6B85 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]