Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Craig> MySQL is a wee bit faster,
I keep seeing this, but I sometimes see the opposite. That "MySQL is faster"
meme seems peristent though, as if the PostgreSQL want to provide *some*
justification for people to continue to have a reason for MySQL.
Given the cost of programmer time (and the cost of lost data) vs the
cost of a slightly faster processor, is it ever really worth it even
if MySQL is *twice* as fast?
OpenBSD is secure.
NetBSD is portable.
PostgreSQL has more features.
mySQL is fast.
It seems that quick characterizations are quite popular.
--
Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD Users Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/
http://www.stilyagin.com/ |
