On 2025-07-09, Kirill A Korinsky <kir...@korins.ky> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jul 2025 22:54:50 +0200, > Stuart Henderson <stu.li...@spacehopper.org> wrote: >> >> - restore (and archive browsing) on OpenBSD is more annoying than it could >> be if we had a fuse implementation that was a bit more compatible with >> current versions on other os. >> > > It has a fork with name rustic which has interactive mode to navigate inside > snapshots, and webdav.
not a fork, it's different software written in a different language though using a compatible repo format. "rustic currently is in beta state and misses regression tests. It is not recommended to use it for production backups, yet." https://rustic.cli.rs/docs/comparison-restic.html restic development: "conservative with changes" (which I agree with from experience) is a good state for backup software. rustic: "moving fast, add new features early" ... I wouldn't use it for backups yet though maybe worth a look for use as a restore tool. There is also https://github.com/emuell/restic-browser. -- Please keep replies on the mailing list.
