> i would not be too surprised if the debian folks just passed along in > their infotext whatever they got told by the upstream (HPA whatever, in this > case?), so if you wanted to try to see what claimed bugs were fixed, maybe > chase that source tree down? (good luck?).
I believe the author meant he had "poorly implemented features that openbsd's tftp lacked" when he said he had "fixed openbsd's bugs". Debian got their description from the readme/changelog of this package. >From the code, hpa-tftp appears to be openbsd's tftp ripped apart in the traditional gnu style with a few features poorly implemented and handfuls of bugs sprinkled about. Now I understand why portable SSH is made for the masses, some things you can't trust people to "fix" on their own.
