Дана 24/07/13 02:18AM, Pontus Stenetorp написа: > Always used: > > wc -l $(find vim90 -name '*.[ch]') > > Which gives roughly the same *rough* estimate: 516,321. > > I take it you have that function for cases where the number of files > is very large and would not fit the buffer for your shell?
No, I use the version I listed because I can format the output as I see fit, and it gives per-file statistics. > You can also > group your wc(1) calls by using + as your terminator instead of \;. I know of that. Directories I run this function in usually don't have that many files for the "overhead" of exec'ing another wc is significant.
