On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 21:24:01 +1000 Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:02:40AM -0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2024-07-08, Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote: > > > This is current/amd64 on a Thinkpad T410 (full dmesg below). > > > Strangely, upon booting, xenodm sets the resolution to 640x480: > > > > > > [ 974.100] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1440x900"x0.0 96.10 1440 1488 > > > 1552 1728 900 903 909 926 -hsync -vsync (55.6 kHz eP) > > > [ 974.100] (II) intel(0): Modeline "1440x900"x0.0 80.30 1440 1488 > > > 1552 1728 900 903 909 926 -hsync -vsync (46.5 kHz e) > > > [ 994.984] (II) intel(0): switch to mode 640x400@60.0 on LVDS1 using > > > pipe 0, position (0, 0), rotation normal, reflection none > > > > shouldn't that be using modesetting rather than intel? or is the machine > > too old? > > > > inteldrm0: msi, IRONLAKE, gen 5 > > xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86pciBus.c > > ---------------------------- > revision 1.14 > date: 2017/09/25 15:05:57; author: matthieu; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0; > commitid: wvjaQqtz2qvU9jZw; > Force Intel Ironlake chipsets to use the xf86-video-intel driver. > stsp@ reported that modesetting(4) has been reported unreliable > on his laptop, while intel(4) works. > > XXXX to be removed after 6.2 to figure out and fix the issue. > > ok kettenis@, also discussed briefly with deraadt@ during EuroBSDCon. > ---------------------------- > > the intel driver requires pci access so won't work with > startx as we stopped installing Xorg setuid >
I remember many years ago modesetting wasn't reliable in this machine. I also had issues with intel SNA acceleration (I had to use UXA). Currently seems to work fine. But, I can't tell for sure, I'm not using this machine every day.
