Willy Manga <wil...@manbene.net> wrote: > On 14/02/2024 09:31, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Willy Manga <wil...@manbene.net> wrote: > > > >> Is it possible the default ntpd.conf file use something like > >> > >> "servers openbsd.pool.ntp.org" and of course have openbsd.pool.ntp.org > >> looking for IPv6 nodes? > > Not going to happen. > > Fine. Can we at least have a workaround from the start? > > Change "#servers pool.ntp.org" with another pool of servers available > in IPv6? Ideally I agree it must be fixed upstream. That's why I filed > an issue on github.
No. This is not our problem. We are making a balanced decision based up the crappy pool ntp ecosystem. They try to push people into smaller and smaller sub-communities where they can make decisions of their own which will affect our community. That's wrong. I've seen enough of their past meddling we will not do that. We would remove the pool entry from the config file before we choose a curate pool selection. > At that moment, I don't know how the OpenBSD ecosystem prefers to deal > with that kind of issue: wait for a fix from the upstream or solve at > its own level the user experience. OpenBSD has nothing to fix. We are not the ones curating what the DNS records translate to.
