There is also some ironic stuff behind these happenings: if you have the possibility to check your lost long file names you will discover that the most significant information are contained in the first 99 chars.
Nowarez Market <my2...@has.im> wrote: > > Clearly the problem is that from the user prospective in these kind > of events all the information contained in the longer file names are > lost. > > A file copy from Android is always completely transparent to the user, > anyhow. Android open behavior "doesn't help" copping with these long > names: if I copy files from an Android tablet and only after some > days I retrieve them..information are lost in OpenBSD. > > > Nowarez Market <my2...@has.im> wrote: > > > I have a fat32 usb stick that I use to transfer files > > from/to my Android tablet since years. > > > > I just want to drop the hint that Android manage > > to render the file names exceeding 255 chars offering > > the user the long form anyway while OpenBSD strictly > > apply the FAT specs rendering these file names > > in the 8 chars format. > >
