Kubernetes' philosophy quite contradicts to OpenBSDs. Also, Kubernetes builds upon Linux technologies. Porting that stuff alone to OpenBSD would mean a great deal of work, and again does not really fit OpenBSDs developers ideas. The resources of OpenBSD is just a tiny fraction of that of kubernetes alone, so in my opinion and probably in theirs also they should keep doing what they have done for a long time and what they are good at: focus on OpenBSDs development (and of course their other projects!). The good part: anyone interested in that could just grab the source and start hacking together Kubernetes for OpenBSD, though that work is probably overwhelming.
Being a heavy kubernetes user myself I would not choose OpenBSD in order to run kubernetes, because I choose OpenBSD for different reasons/requirements. What's the sense of simply putting tremendous effort in copying a solution that is already out there, noone wants OpenBSD to become a Linux-clone, it would be wasted energy. A metaphor: while both systems are a kind of mobile housing, I do not want my lightweight trekking tent to become a mongolian yurt overnight. On 03.03.23 19:33, Ken Young wrote:
Hello, I am a BSD user and also a user of kubernetes. It seems the BSD community has no much interest in docker/k8s integration. Is it true? and why? Thanks.
