And I think you are INCORRECT. The #1 reason to make a manual page visible is for learning.
The people on clang architectures need to know that the gcc systems are different, that different decisions have been made. Education is way more important than consistancy. This manual page is not hurting you. "Stanislav Syekirin" wrote: > I agree. I would expect man pages for as(1), gcc(1), gcc-local(1) > etc. to be present if as and gcc are present, and absent if they are > absent. Or, alternatively, gcc-local(1) should document which > platforms use gcc and which don't. > > Regards > Stanislav > > On Do, 2 Mär 2023 22:47:08 +0000 > Jason McIntyre <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote: > > > i don;t think we should be installing gcc-local(1) on any archs > > where > > gcc isnt happening: > > $ uname -a > > OpenBSD manila.kerhand.co.uk 7.2 GENERIC.MP#22 amd64 > > $ man gcc > > man: No entry for gcc in the manual. > > jmc > > >
