On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 06:43:46PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > > > In my experience resampling quality in any particular implementation > > > is not guaranteed and can introduce significant artifacts. > > > Declaring a particular implementation "good enough" without > > > knowing more seems premature. > > > > Here are the measures of the aliasing noise using sine sweeps. Check > > the figure for the 44.1kHz to 48kH conversion, the sndiod column: > > > > https://arverb.com/pub/src/ > > > > I did simple A/B tests with music from CDs and my ears couldn't hear > > the aliasing noise. Try it. > > Does this bit of sndiod(8) still apply? > > BUGS > Resampling is low quality; down-sampling especially > should be avoided when recording. >
AFAICS, aliasing is not audible in most desktop setups. People with pro equipment probably already avoid real-time resampling. So, if nobody objects, I'll drop it.
