On 2022-05-03, kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net> wrote: > rspamd manual assume, that we should use this construction: > > ExecStart=/bin/sh -c '/usr/bin/razor-check && /usr/bin/echo -n "spam" || > /usr/bin/echo -n "ham"' > > The razor-check manual confirm this: "razor-check" terminates with exit > value 0 if the signature for the mail is catalogued on the server (spam) > or 1 if the mail is not catalogued by the server (not a spam). > > I don't like this construction, and can't even imagine that we can do > the same with inetd.
> Maybe i should put all this to some script and call it from inetd, but > i'm not sure it this a good idea or not. it may work direct in inetd.conf, but yes that would be neater. I don't think there's any disadvantage to running it in a shell script rather than as a "sh -c" construct. btw keep an eye on how it performs, I haven't used pyzor/razor in a fairly long time but have used dcc more recently, I found it fairly easy for some bulk/automated non-spam to get caught up by the checks. I stopped using it because of this, the biggest problem was mail where there were a couple of other spam signs (but not enough to trigger detection by themselves). at least, you really don't want to learn symbols for Bayesian detection or feed neural network detection from those mails.
