On 2022-02-17 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022-02-17, Matthias Pressfreund <m...@fn.de> wrote: >> On a server with 3 LAN interfaces (re0/1/2): >> * re0 connected to the ISP >> * re1 connected to the internal network >> * re2 so far unused >> >> I was setting up pf queues for bandwidth control as follows: >> * one queue on re0 for outgoing traffic >> * another queue on re1 for incoming traffic >> >> Now, I would like to connect a wireless LAN router to re2 offering a >> guest network. As far as I understood, a pf queue has to be bound to >> exactly one network interface. So I'm wondering if there is another way >> to include incoming traffic on re2 into the very same bandwidth control >> currently realized by the queue on re1. > > A queue is bound to one interface, but, you can have multiple queues > with the same name. "queue foo on em0", "queue foo on em1". > > An assignment in PF e.g. "queue foo" will then use whichever is the > relevant "foo on $iface" when packets are transmitted which match > the PF state created by that rule. >
Just for curiosity... What happens if after binding "queue foo on em0", there is a rule like "pass out on em1 set queue foo"? Will a packet passed out here (on em1) go into the bandwidth control bound on queue foo even though bound to em0?
