Am 13.10.21 09:58 schrieb Peter J. Philipp:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:02:35AM +0200, Michael Hekeler wrote:
> > Hello list,
> > 
> > I have question regarding network/routing. However it is not directly
> > openbsd related (I can see the same even on windows machines) I decided
> > to ask here because I know that there are many experienced admins here
> > and there is wealth of expertise on such things on this list.
> > 
> > On my site there are about 10 clients which connects to an internet
> > database host.
> > From time to time connection gets lost and sometimes the clients
> > reconnect after a while but sometimes the database app breaks.
> > 
> > When doing network diagnostics with mtr(8) which combines the
> > functionality of traceroute(8) and ping(8) it shows the packets hopping
> > through 8 to 9 hosts to reach the destination.
> > When running this tool for a few hours it shows that two hosts in this
> > route produces packet loss (~20%).
> > 
> > My Question:
> > is there anything I can do about that by myself or is only option to
> > contact the admin of these hosts and hope that they are willing to fix
> > whatever problem there is?
> 
> If you have 9 hops and the packet loss is on hop 4 and 5 but does not carry
> over to the destination you can ignore it.  If it carries over to the
> destination ie. hops 6, 7, 8 and 9, then you should look further at reaching
> out.
> 
> The reason is as follows:  some routers pass packets through their ASIC's for
> forwarding and it doesn't touch their processor at all, it's like offloading
> the entire packet forwarding process.  Yet when you talk to the IP of the
> router directly, which is what ping does then the processor in the router
> processes the packet and this may cause packet loss becuase usually they don't
> have a fast cpu here.  And ICMP doesn't have much priority in this case 
> either.
> 
> Best regards,
> -peter
> 

That's very interesting. Thank you so much.
According to the DB hoster the loss showing at traceroute's output on
hop 4 and 5 of 9 would provide reliable proof that the connection is the
culprit.
Now I understand that this conclusion is not automatically true.
Hops 6,7,8,9 showed no more than 1% loss.

Reply via email to