On 2021-08-10, Mihai Popescu <mih...@gmail.com> wrote: > I did some download from [1] and the SHA256 for miniroot69.img is FAIL. > The files with _obsd trails are from [2] and they are verified OK. > Build date: 1628609840 - Tue Aug 10 15:37:20 UTC 2021 > > [1] https://ftp2.eu.openbsd.org/ > [2] https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/
Would be helpful to say which directory so we don't need to guess between 6.9/snapshots and which arch. > $ sha256 -C SHA256 miniroot69.img > (SHA256) miniroot69.img: FAILED > c$ signify -Cp /etc/signify/openbsd-69-base.pub -x SHA256.sig > miniroot69.img > Signature Verified > miniroot69.img: FAIL > > $ cmp SHA256_obsd SHA256 > > $ cmp SHA256_obsd.sig SHA256.sig > $ cmp miniroot69_obsd.img miniroot69.img > > miniroot69_obsd.img miniroot69.img differ: char 32808, line 6 > $ diff SHA256_obsd SHA256 > $ diff SHA256_obsd.sig SHA256.sig > $ diff miniroot69_obsd.img miniroot69.img > Binary files miniroot69_obsd.img and miniroot69.img differ > > Tried other parameters for cmp and diff, but the list is huge for the first. > $ cmp -l miniroot69_obsd.img miniroot69.img > 32808 11 374 > 32809 21 34 > 32810 146 252 > 32811 357 267 > 33306 100 40 > 33308 0 23 > 33309 360 100 > 33310 377 1 > 33311 25 377 > 33312 140 17 > 33313 1 0 > 33314 27 0 > 33315 200 0 > 33316 1 0 > 33317 31 0 > 33318 240 0 > 33319 1 0 > 33320 33 0 > 33321 300 0 > 33322 1 0 > 33323 35 377 > 33324 340 17 > [ more displayed, output cut ] > > If somebody else can test this, please. > > Thanks. > You don't show the actual hash so it may have changed since you fetched, but currently if I fetch snapshots/amd64/miniroot69.img from ftp2.eu the hash doesn't match the SHA256 file in that directory, but it does match the SHA256 file that I fetched on my local mirror earlier today. I think it's most likely just that the mirror updated at an inconvenient time, it happens fairly often with snapshots. -- Please keep replies on the mailing list.
