> On 2021-06-13, ropers wrote: >> Sorry to disturb, but does anyone know how to contact whoever is >> responsible for ports.su? >> An email address would be great, though I'm not sure if it's okay to >> post that on-list. Perhaps it's okay to send that off-list? >> >> Thank you, >> Ian
edgar wrote: > edgar@edgar-ThinkPad-T420:~$ whois ports.su > ... > e-mail: [REDACTED] Sorry, I should have said, I did check whois, and I did try that address and got an MTA reply back that that mailbox is full (so prolly unattended). On 13/06/2021, Stuart Henderson wrote: > It's Constantine Murenin, I'm not sure of working contact methods. > > The only one of these 'ports browser' websites which is expected to > actually handle the ports tree correctly is https://openports.pl/ > which runs a copy of ports-readmes-dancer (which is also in ports > if you'd like to run your own copy locally). Others are either > just completed outdated themselves (ports.su) or we've seen them > not parse things properly from the ports tree (openports.se). Thanks for that. My noticing that ports.su (hitherto my go-to) was actually pretty outdated was precisely the reason why I wanted to contact the site maintainer. If nobody else has working contact details for Constantine, then I'll probably leave it. I didn't actually know about openports.pl, or dancer. Thank you very much. :) (It bothers me a tiny amount that these sites call themselves ports readmes, which IMHO overloads the term "readme". OTOH, "Ports Readme" != README, so eh...) Thanks and regards, Ian (Ian Ropers)
