passioncereales, fdhdp, icm, if. afm et sidaction probablement aussi si ce sont des vms. Après la faille concerne des versions spécifiques de composants vmware, je ne sais pas quelle version gère ces vms.
----- On May 31, 2021, at 11:18 AM, Heinrich Rebehn heinrich.reb...@rebehn.net wrote: >> On 31. May 2021, at 11:03, Otto Moerbeek <o...@drijf.net >> <mailto:o...@drijf.net>> wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:32:56AM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> My /etc/pf.conf contains a table which is initialized from a file: >>> >>> table <myservers> file "/root/pf/tables/myservers” >>> >>> This table ist not referred to in pf.conf, but in an anchor which is loaded >>> later on. >>> I found out that even when the anchor is loaded, the table does not exist. >> >> See the "persist" keywoard in pf.conf. >> >> -Otto > > Thanks, I should have known that. For some reason I figured that initializing > from a file would include “persist”, but that is nonsense. > > -Heinrich > >> >>> >>> # pfctl -t myservers -T show >>> pfctl: Table does not exist >>> # pfctl -sT >>> private >>> rtun0 >>> rtun1 >>> trusted >>> >>> If I load pf with "# pfctl -o none -f /etc/pf.conf", the table appears. If >>> I use >>> >>> set ruleset-optimization none >>> >>> it doesn’t. >>> >>> Is this expected behavior? >>> >>> Also rcctl(8) does not allow eating flags for pf >>> >>> # rcctl set pf flags "-o none" >>> rcctl: "pf" is a special variable, cannot "set flags” >>> >>> Workaounds would be setting flag in /etc/rc.conf.local or adding "pfctl -o >>> none >>> -f /etc/pf.conf” to rc.local >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> > >> -Heinrich
