uhhhhh, what did you just say?  I don't understand.

What are you trying to do?

why would you need a second name server on your local LAN?  The
netgear can only port forward for one.  Are you trying to route
between the 2 nics on the OBSD machine?

Gmail b0rked your ASCII diagram.

--Bryan


On 3/3/06, Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure which way to jump with this question which is a
> reflection of unskilled, inexperienced networking background.
>
> This may not even be the right way to do it.
>
> First:  This is all something of a training exercise and not
>         an important production setup.
>
> Summary:
> I'm attempting to add a second nic and address on a machine running
> current.  I also run an authoratative nameserver on a separate machine
> not running bsd but running bind-9.3.2.  So this problem may slop over
> into the named setup on a gentoo linux box.
>
> A simple diagram will convey more than a description: The prefix to all
> displayed IPs is 192.168, but be aware it is simplified ... there are
> more machines involved.
>
>                      INTERNET
>                        | (Dynamic IP)
>                        |
>                     NETGEAR (consumer grade router FVS-318)
>                        | 0.20
>   --------------------------------------------------
>   | 0.4            | 0.3          | 0.5            | 0.19
>   |                |              |                |
> [ m1 ]           [ m2 ]         [ m3 ]           [ m4 ]
>   | 1.2                                            | 1.1
>   |________________ Unswitched hub ________________|
>
> So the far right (m4) is the obsd machine and is sent copies of all
> connections that come to NETGEAR.  All incoming on that intface is
> blocked and logged (0.19).  Out on that int_fc is passed keeping
> state.
>
> In and out are passed with no restrictions on 1.1.  This line
> in /etc/sysctl.conf is not uncommented nor is it set manually.
>    # net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 # 1=Permit [...]
>
> I've tried to set this up all under one domain so my network would end
> up 192.168/16  all under `local.lan'.  I'm not sure that is the best
> way to go but it seemed to be easier to setup bind on the other computer
> this way.  Or I should say I lacked examples for doing it. While going
> net/16 is similar to the examples in `DNS and Bind 4th. ed'.
>
> /etc/hostname.* look like:
> /etc/hostname.rl0                  /etc/hostname.xl0
>   192.168.0.19 255.255.0.0           192.168.1.1 255.255.0.0
>
> /etc/mygate
>   192.168.0.20
>
> So how do I keep stuff from happening like firing up
> `lynx www.google.com'  and not being able to connect because
> 192.168.1.1  tries to handle it?
>
> I think I'm missing specific routing for 1.1.

Reply via email to