tech-lists <tech-li...@zyxst.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:25:01AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >The miniroot is 33MB because it contains many install firmwares, and > >it is 97% full. > > > >I suggest you find another way of installing. > > > > Is there a technical (or some other reason I'm not seeing) why miniroot68.fs > has been made as small as it is, and not some other size like 48MB, which > would allow the msdos partition to be made larger?
Why 48MB? Why not 2GB? Why not make miniroot68.img be 2GB for download to satisfy some bizzare usage pattern? All media are created to be small, no larger than they need to be.
