On Sunday, February 26, "Sgt. Stedenko" wrote: > > I had already seen that one and didn't find it to be any help. Thanks > anyways though for taking the time. The author offers a solution but no > explanation. I've tuned many sysctl's and experimented with the mtu's, > changing from autoselect to 1000baseT, a few more things. It's two devices > acting as a bridge and together they keep a dual opteron system at 70% on > CPU0 and the second CPU1 doesn't see any action until CPU0 maxes out. I'd > like to change this behaviour.
I hope you can code. Seriously. --Toby.
