I’ll be explicit. Did the OP run ls(1) as superuser? See -A flag in man ls
We have no idea. > On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Brian Brombacher <br...@planetunix.net> wrote: > > > >>> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:38 PM, Ottavio Caruso >>> <ottavio2006-usenet2...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 19:59, Richard Ipsum <richardip...@vx21.xyz> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ, >>> OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden" directories like .git, >>> whereas GNU coreutils will not, is this expected behaviour or a bug? >>> >> >> Funny, because this seems to validate what you are reporting: >> >> oc@OpenBSD:~$ ls -R >> oc-backup test >> >> ./.local/share: >> xorg >> >> ./.local/share/xorg: >> Xorg.0.log Xorg.0.log.old >> >> ./oc-backup: >> docs mbox >> >> ./oc-backup/docs: >> bgpd.conf man-todo patch.patch root-mail >> bug oc-mail robots.txt sudo.log >> >> ./test: >> dmesg fstab index.html uyiuyi >> file fstab.dos ls.ps >> file.bak fstab.tr openbsd-tips-wip >> file.orig fstab.unix test.wav >> >> <note the ./.local/share and ./.local/share/xorg> >> >> However: >> >> oc@OpenBSD:~$ mkdir .hidden >> oc@OpenBSD:~$ touch .hidden/test-file >> oc@OpenBSD:~$ ls -R >> >> <same as above and ./.hidden is not appearing> >> >> It looks like "ls -R" is showing some hidden directories but not all. >> >> -- >> Ottavio Caruso >> > > man ls > man ksh > >
