> I like where this thread is headed.
>
> To expand on this idea, maybe we should demonstrate how diversity and
> inclusiveness can work in an operating system via language choices.
> Why stop at TCL and LUA? Or even scripting languages in general. Why
> not Go, Rust, Haskell and Scala too?
>
> Hear me out. We can set up a raffle system so that each winner can
> write their winning tool in their language of choice. All the
> parallel development will even solve the "multi year effort" problem
> that was brought up by the original poster too. Nobody will mind
> having another 8 or 9 languages in the base system, right?
underrated response
eww rust *cringe*
i suspect 2020 will see a sharp increase in the woke brigade's attempts to
place
OpenBSD firmly underfoot of the diversity agenda. OpenBSD is one of the
last
extremely rare bastions of freedom that hasn't been coerced into marching
in
lockstep with the crowd of progressive madness. and don't think that it
doesn't
grind on the gears of those power hungry authoritarian narcissist pushers
of
the diversity drug who know better than you, who are better than you and
who
do better than you with every virtue signaling code of conduct and safe
(space)
language. you didn't think it was coincidence that c is demonized for not
being
"safe" did you? rather than the programmer being responsible for writing
unsafe
code we need to regulate what the programmer can do just like we need to
regulate what the community can say, do, see, and think. accountability is
oppression. it's not his fault he didn't do any error handling it's c's
fault!
At moment, I want my privacy to be protected.
https://mytemp.email/
