Hi, WAF is detected when certain methods are filtered in relayd.
Thanks, Kihaguru. On Monday, December 9, 2019, Kihaguru Gathura <pqscr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > A message form assessors and further tests below. > > </mail/u/1/s/?view=att&th=16ee9e8c520462f2&attid=0.1&disp=emb&realattid=ii_k3y7kgeo0&zw&atsh=1> > > > I have configured relayd to serve a single url that accepts no parameters. This url is blocked by relayd with error 403 Forbidden if anything is appended to its end. > I would expect WAF detection in such a test case but this has not happened. > what other means are malicious payloads being delivered in this case? > > Thanks and regards, > Kihaguru > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > # $OpenBSD: relayd.conf,v 1.5 2018/05/06 20:56:55 benno Exp $ > # > # Relay and protocol > # > http protocol httpp { > return error > match response header remove "Server" > > pass > block quick path "/cgi-bin/index.cgi" value "*command=*" > pass quick path "/net/index.html" value "" > block > } > > relay httpr { > # Listen on localhost, accept diverted connections from pf(4) > listen on 127.0.0.1 port 8080 > protocol httpp > > # Forward to the original target host > forward to destination > } > > http protocol httpsp { > return error > match response header remove "Server" > > pass > block quick path "/cgi-bin/index.cgi" value "*command=*" > pass quick path "/net/index.html" value "" > block > > tls keypair example.net > } > > relay httpsr { > # Listen on localhost, accept diverted connections from pf(4) > listen on 127.0.0.1 port 8443 tls > protocol httpsp > > # Forward to the original target host > forward with tls to destination > } > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 2:11 PM Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: >> >> On 2019/12/05 00:17, Kihaguru Gathura wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 11:58 PM Kihaguru Gathura <pqscr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Which is a better way to implement a WAF on OpenBSD using the base utilities? >> > > >> > > relayd configured in certain ways might be considered as a WAF. >> > >> > >> > All methods and all other security headers and path filters are coded in the web >> > application which had always been detected as a custom WAF until two weeks ago. >> > >> > I have now included relayd and a re-test passes all other requirements but does not detect >> > a WAF (please find sample configurations and test report below). >> > >> > Any hint highly appreciated >> >> I think you will need to talk to your assessors and ask what they're looking for. >> >