On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:35:27PM +0000, flauenroth wrote:
> Apparently not just theo is using fvwm after all. :) 
> 

I have been using it about half the time now.
But that was only after copying a config posted here and then modifying
it.
I have had a really hard time getting accurate information about config
options. Many of the options from FVWM site/lists just don't work.
However, it's mostly reliable, except that I do have to restart it
occasionally.

I will ask if the default config could perhaps be slightly changed?
I find the font size just too small for my eyesight now.
No big changes, though. We do have to learn.

> I heard from many people that fvwm is clunky, old and should not be used. But 
> I personally like fvwm a lot. It's like using ed or vi over MS or Libre 
> Office. I like to have "simple" software in the means of the software or more 
> precise its authors don't anticipate what I want to do.  
> 

As far as ed(1) goes, I'm thrilled to say that I am now using it on my
phone to edit files. The keyboard takes up a ton of space and with ed I
can crank up the font size and work really nice!

> _______________________________
> Always exit with 42 to return the answer.

42 bytes makes up some badass quotes or script! :D

Chris Bennett


Reply via email to